Turn sludge into value streams with pyrolysis
Fully automated steam-drying and pyrolysis technology
- HECLA®
- For wastewater utilities
- For engineering consultants
HECLA® transforms sludge from a disposal cost into a resource. As the first integrated steam-drying and pyrolysis plant for sewage sludge in commercial operation (Odsherred 2021), it uses the energy in the sludge itself to sustain the process, minimising external energy demand and reducing operating costs.
Utilities, municipalities, and wastewater treatment plants use it to:
- Reduce waste management costs
- Upcycle municipal waste and wet biomass into biochar
- Reduce environmental pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions
- Turn disposal costs into revenue streams from carbon removal credits, biochar and thermal energy
Download HECLA® 1000 & 1500 product sheet
Download biochar product sheet
Wastewater legislation is tightening. Disposal routes are shrinking. For utilities today, recycling vital nutrients and meeting carbon emission targets means navigating restricted land-spreading and skyrocketing PFAS fees.
Solutions like ours address these regulatory hurdles without compromising safety standards for operators, the community, and the environment.
Download HECLA® 1000 & 1500 product sheet
Download biochar product sheet
Solving the sludge crisis requires a modular solution that is innovative enough to make a difference, yet reliable enough to mitigate risks of a large-scale transition. Making a compact footprint is also essential when integrating into existing plants.
HECLA® is a field-proven solution that transforms wastewater sludge into a recirculated resource, reducing pollutants and lowering emissions. Engineered for safe operations, it is fully automated and operates 24/7. While financial returns depend on site-specific factors, our technology is designed to support competitive payback periods and stable OPEX.
| HECLA® 1.000 |
HECLA® 1.500 | |
| Biosolid volume treated per year | 1000 tonnes (on dry matter basis) | 1500 tonnes (on dry matter basis) |
|
Unit dimensions (L x W x H) |
15 x 14 x 5 m | 16 x 16 x 5.5 m |
| Total weight | 45 tonnes | 80 tonnes |
reduction in sludge volume
1.000 and 1.500
Fully automated, continuous
steam-drying and pyrolysis

Next, the dried biomass is pyrolysed for approximately 20 minutes at 650°C in an oxygen-free pyrolysis oven. The process substantially reduces organic contaminants in the solid fraction, including PFAS, pharmaceuticals and other organic micropollutants¹ ² ³ The process releases pyrolysis gas, which is combusted to generate thermal energy for drying and pyrolysis. The resulting biochar retains phosphorus and stable carbon.⁵ ⁶
The result is a nutrient-rich, odour-free biochar containing 5-8% phosphorous.10 The biochar can be used as a soil improver or upcycled into a substitute to activated carbon. What’s more, the stable carbon fraction persists for centuries or longer, 8 providing an efficient way to remove atmospheric CO₂ and achieve long-term sequestration. 9
Activated carbon substitute
Biochar removes similar amounts of pollutants as activated carbon, but through a significantly more cost-effective process.
Agriculture
Biochar acts as a stable, porous material that improves soil structure, enhances water retention, and helps retain essential nutrients in the root zone.
Carbon Credit Market (CDR)
Biochar enables long-term carbon sequestration, so utilities may generate and sell Carbon Dioxide Removal Certificates (CDRs/CORCs). Market prices currently range around 100–150 €/tonne CO₂e.
Construction
Biochar can partially replace fossil-based carbon materials or supplementary cementitious materials in concrete and building products. This potentially improves material properties while reducing the carbon footprint of the sector.
How AquaGreen compares with alternative sludge treatment technologies
AquaGreen
Autothermal pyrolysis & steam-dryingEnvironmental safety: Reduces PFAS and other pollutants below detectable levels
ROI: ~4 to 11 years; driven by energy savings and byproduct sales
Byproduct: Carbon-sequestering, phosphorous-rich biochar
Revenue potential: High; carbon removal credits, biochar and thermal energy
Market Alternative
Direct incinerationSludge volume reduction: ~90%
Environmental safety: Air emission concerns and carbon-heavy
ROI: Up to 30 years; often the lifetime of the plant
Byproduct: Landfilled bottom ash and hazardous fly ash
Revenue potential: None
Market Alternative
Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)Sludge volume reduction: ~75%
Environmental safety: Partial PFAS and pollutant removal
ROI: ~7 to 12 years; requires high gate fees
Byproduct: Hydrochar is toxic to plants
Revenue potential: Low; fewer carbon removal credits per tonne
HECLA® in action
“Pyrolysis has the potential to reshape how we think about biosolids. By converting sludge into useful products, this technology could offer a more resilient and circular approach to wastewater treatment. It’s an important step in exploring how innovation might support the future of our sector.”
“The AquaGreen facility delivers significant environmental and economic benefits to Lemvig Water and the local community. As PFAS-contaminated sludge can no longer be applied to agricultural land, pyrolysis is the preferred solution.”
“We selected AquaGreen as a supplier for their unique pyrolysis package plant solution and their excellent level of technical engagement, which aligns strongly with our ambition to transform sludge management through sustainable, compliant and data-driven approaches.”
“AquaGreen’s technology will provide the exact solution that the wastewater industry has been asking for during the last many years.”
“AquaGreen’s technology offers a robust platform for real-world trials, giving us confidence in its ability to prove the concept of sewage sludge pyrolysis and deliver meaningful insights and long-term value for the sector and for our customers.”
“I want to protect our common groundwater, our environment and ensure a better future for our descendants. That is why we have chosen to invest in AquaGreen’s technology.”
“I see huge potential in AquaGreen and their sustainable sludge drying technology. No doubt that the timing is right for this type of technology within a number of industries.”
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. Pyrolysis can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by avoiding methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions associated with sludge storage and land application, while retaining part of the biogenic carbon in stable biochar.⁵
The stable carbon fraction in biochar can persist for centuries or longer.8 Life-cycle assessments indicate climate savings of approximately 1,000–1,500 kg CO₂e per tonne of sludge dry matter compared with conventional storage and direct land application.⁵
Yes. Pyrolysis combined with thermal oxidation of process gases can achieve substantial PFAS reduction. AquaGreen testing has shown PFAS below detection limits in biochar and flue gas under documented operating conditions.³
Published studies also report strong PFAS removal during pyrolysis, including full-scale and pilot-scale systems with subsequent thermal oxidation.²
The HECLA® process includes thermal oxidation, where pyrolysis gases are combusted at approximately 900–1000°C. Depending on the installed configuration, downstream gas treatment may include wet scrubbing and filtration to control acid gases, particles and other residual contaminants.³
Emission levels depend on feedstock composition, plant configuration and operating conditions, and compliance is assessed against the limits defined in the environmental permit for each site.
At high temperatures, microplastics and organic micropollutants such as pharmaceuticals are thermally degraded or removed from the solid phase.
Microplastics degrade at approximately 450–500°C⁴ , while pharmaceuticals have been reported below detection limits at temperatures above approximately 500–600°C.¹
Pyrolysis provides hygienisation and can substantially reduce organic contaminants.¹
Agricultural use depends on national regulations, biochar quality, contaminant testing and compliance with applicable heavy-metal limits. Phosphorus is largely retained in the biochar during sludge pyrolysis⁶, while heavy metals are not destroyed but can show reduced mobility compared with untreated sludge.⁶ ⁷
Typical return on investment (ROI) with HECLA® is 4–11 years, depending on sludge composition, disposal costs, energy prices and site-specific factors such as utilisation, regulatory conditions and available incentives.
Aside from faster ROI, utilities switch to integrated steam-drying and pyrolysis technology to reduce disposal costs, increase energy recovery and potentially receive revenue from carbon removal credit.
No. Organic pollutants are thermally degraded during pyrolysis, while heavy metals remain largely in the solid phase and can show reduced mobility compared with untreated sludge.¹⁶⁷ Process gases are oxidised and treated before discharge.³
Studies show substantial reduction of organic contaminants in the solid phase and reduced mobility of heavy metals after pyrolysis.¹⁶⁷ AquaGreen measurements have shown PFAS below detection limits in flue gas before and after scrubber treatment under documented test conditions.³
AquaGreen biochar is a stable, carbon-rich material with high phosphorus retention and low levels of organic contaminants under documented operating conditions. It is produced through controlled high-temperature pyrolysis, which substantially reduces organic pollutants¹², can lower the mobility of heavy metals⁶⁷ and stabilises carbon for long-term storage.⁵
Scientific studies show that at temperatures around 600°C and above:
- Organic micropollutants, including pharmaceuticals, PAHs and PCBs, are substantially reduced¹
- PFAS is substantially reduced during pyrolysis under documented operating conditions²³
- Microplastics are thermally degraded at high pyrolysis temperatures⁴
- Heavy metals are not destroyed but can show reduced mobility compared with untreated sludge⁶⁷
HECLA® operates at approximately 650°C with a residence time of around 20 minutes, followed by thermal oxidation of the process gases.³ These operating conditions are within documented temperature ranges for the degradation of plastics and many organic contaminants, while phosphorus is largely retained in the biochar.⁶ 10
Scientific references
Organic pollutant reduction
¹ Moško, J., Pohořelý, M., Cajthaml, T., Jeremiáš, M., Robles-Aguilar, A. A., Skoblia, S., Beňo, Z., Innemanová, P., Linhartová, L., Michalíková, K., & Meers, E. (2021). Effect of pyrolysis temperature on removal of organic pollutants present in anaerobically stabilized sewage sludge. Chemosphere, 265, 129082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129082
² Sørmo, E., Castro, G., Hubert, M., Licul-Kucera, V., Quintanilla, M., Asimakopoulos, A. G., Cornelissen, G., & Arp, H. P. H. (2023). The decomposition and emission factors of a wide range of PFAS in diverse, contaminated organic waste fractions undergoing dry pyrolysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 454, 131447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131447
³ AquaGreen (2023), PFAS Elimination by Pyrolysis – White Paper.
⁴ Keller, A. A., Li, W., Floyd, Y., Bae, J., Clemens, K. M., Thomas, E., Han, Z., & Adeleye, A. S. (2024). Elimination of microplastics, PFAS, and PPCPs from biosolids via pyrolysis to produce biochar: Feasibility and techno-economic analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 947, 174773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174773
Carbon storage and greenhouse gas reduction
⁵ Thomsen, T.P. (2018), Drying and Pyrolysis of Sludge – in a Climate Perspective. DTU Chemical Engineering.
⁸ European Commission (2026). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/285 of 3 February 2026 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3012 by establishing the certification methodologies for permanent carbon removals activities. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202600285
⁹ Sanei, H., Wojtaszek-Kalaitzidi, M., Schovsbo, N. H., Stenshøj, R., Zhou, Z., Schmidt, H.-P., Hagemann, N., Chiaramonti, D., Kiaitsis, T., Rudra, A., Lehner, A. J., Brown, R. W., Gill, S., Dorr, E., Kalaitzidis, S., Goodarzi, F., & Petersen, H. I. (2025). Quantifying inertinite carbon in biochar. International Journal of Coal Geology, 310, 104886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2025.104886
Phosphorus retention and heavy metal mobility
⁶ Yang, Y., Meehan, B., Shah, K., Surapaneni, A., Hughes, J., Fouché, L., & Paz-Ferreiro, J. (2018). Physicochemical Properties of Biochars Produced from Biosolids in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071459
⁷ Sørmo, E., Dublet-Adli, G., Menlah, G., Flatabø, G. Ø., Zivanovic, V., Carlsson, P., Almås, Å., & Cornelissen, G. (2024). Heavy Metals in Pyrolysis of Contaminated Wastes: Phase Distribution and Leaching Behaviour. Environments, 11(6), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11060130
¹⁰ Müller-Stöver, D., Thompson, R., Lu, C., Thomsen, T. P., Glæsner, N., & Bruun, S. (2021). Increasing Plant Phosphorus Availability in Thermally Treated Sewage Sludge by Post-Process Oxidation and Particle Size Management. Waste Management, 120, 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.034

